🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," said the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some individuals to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this global debate continues, the steps of this nation and its followers show that states globally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to self-regulate.